This Economic Insights article addresses the extent to which immigrants contribute to economic growth. For the first time, the business ownership and job-creation activities of immigrants are addressed.

Budget 2017 is the next step in the Government's long-term plan to create jobs and strengthen the middle class. Canada is home to a well-educated and highly skilled workforce, but as the demands of the workplace change, so too must the education and skills workers bring to their jobs. The changes in the economy--both here at home and around the world--present incredible opportunities for the middle class and those working hard to join it. With its strong focus on innovation, skills, partnerships and fairness, Budget 2017 takes the next steps in securing a more prosperous future for all Canadians. It helps hard-working, talented and creative people develop the skills they need to drive our most successful industries and high-growth companies forward, and invests in Canadians' well-being through a focus on mental health, home care and Indigenous health care. Today, Finance Minister Bill Morneau tabled the Government's second budget--Building a Strong Middle Class--which continues to invest in middle class Canadians at every stage of their lives, transform our neighbourhoods and communities, and give every Canadian a real and fair chance at success. Budget 2017 will: Equip Canada's workers with the skills and tools they need to succeed in a changing economy. Budget 2017 places Canada's skilled, talented and creative people at the heart of a more innovative economy. It makes smart investments to help adult workers retrain or upgrade their skills to adapt to changes in the new economy, and to help young people get the skills and work experience they need to start their careers. Take an important step towards gender equality, with Canada's first ever Gender Statement, which serves as a basis for ongoing, open and transparent discussions about the role gender plays in policy development. Strengthen Canada's publicly funded, universal health care system to meet the needs of Canadian families. Budget 2017 confirms the Government's historic health funding agreements with 12 provinces and territories by investing in better home care and mental health initiatives that will help the families who need it most. Advance Canada's efforts to build a clean growth economy, by investing in green infrastructure that reduces greenhouse gas emissions, delivers clean air and safe drinking water, and promotes renewable power. Budget 2017 also takes important steps to support the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change. Position Canada at the leading edge of a changing economy, by helping to ensure Canadians are able to access the jobs of the future. Budget 2017 helps connect companies on a global scale, takes an innovative and collaborative approach to solving modern challenges, and helps businesses get what they need to grow. Build stronger communities, by improving access to early learning, child care and affordable housing. Budget 2017 takes concrete action to improve the quality of life of all Canadians, with more cultural and recreational centres, as well as safe and accessible public spaces. Advance reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples, through investments in infrastructure and First Nations and Inuit health, actions to strengthen Indigenous communities, funding to support education and training, and measures to promote language and culture revitalization. Make the tax system fairer for the middle class. Budget 2017 will close tax loopholes, crack down on tax evasion, improve existing tax measures for individuals and families, and eliminate measures that are inefficient or no longer effective. Through Budget 2017, the Government will also be taking steps toward eliminating tax measures that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.

Aligning Skills Development With Labour Market Need builds on the Centre for Skills and Post-Secondary Education's (SPSE) foundational report, Skills?Where Are We Today: The State of Skills and PSE in Canada. A key finding of that report was that the œliteracy, numeracy and problem-solving skills of Canadian adults are less impressive than one might expect for a country with a high level of post-secondary participation and attainment. Aligning Skills Development explores the contradiction of mounting levels of educational attainment coexisting with weak alignment between skills and labour market needs. Understanding this paradox and possible solutions involve an analysis of Canada's skills development system. The report considers the critical role of Canada's labour market information systems, the way employers articulate their skills demands to prospective employees, and the education system that is expected to develop these skills.

This document provides a review of, and framework for understanding, disability definitions in key Government of Canada initiatives. Overall, the report illustrates and seeks to clarify the complex and multi-dimensional nature of the concept of disability found in policy, programs and benefits. It highlights the fact that confusion exists between definitions, eligibility criteria and program objectives. The paper concludes that a single harmonized definition of disability across the Government of Canada may not be desirable or achievable and that the scope of solutions to address the broader issues identified go beyond definitions. In reaching these conclusions, the paper illustrates the various tensions between the concept of disability, program design and the horizontal nature of disability programs. The report is divided into four main sections. Part one describes the evolution of the key disability conceptual models of disability--medical, functional limitation and social and human rights models--as well as the main disability data sources based on these models. Part two is the most detailed section of the report. It provides an inventory of key Government of Canada laws, programs and tax measures that target persons with disabilities in four areas: antidiscrimination legislation; activities of daily living and assistance in the home; income, and employment and learning. The review highlights the varying treatments of disability in each of these four categories, confirming that no single definition of disability exists at the federal level. Instead, disability definitions are found both explicitly and implicitly in legislative statutes and eligibility criteria. The report demonstrates the interaction and influence of these sometimes competing perspectives on disability definitions, objectives and eligibility. In part three, the report provides a summary of the key issues related to defining disability across the Government of Canada, including: the complexity of disability definitions because of the evolving perception of the meaning of disability; the horizontal nature and shared responsibility of disability; the confusion between disability definitions, program objectives and their eligibility criteria (for example, some programs focus on employability and others on income replacement and some programs determine disability through self identification while others require detailed information from medical specialists); and, finally, the need for improved communication and awareness. The report demonstrates that these issues are not easily disentangled and continue to challenge policy responses.Part four highlights key government actions and next steps to address the major issues. The report's conclusion stresses the need to bring more coherence to disability-related programs. Despite the challenges associated with disability definitions, the Government of Canada has undertaken a number of activities aimed at increasing the understanding, awareness and accessibility of programs, services and benefits for Canadians with disabilities. Specific commitments include improving the horizontal management of disability programs, increasing consultation with all partners, streamlining the application and assessment processes, and improving communication products for Canadians. In addition to describing programs, the report provides some examples of concerns related to definitions raised by witnesses appearing before various Parliamentary committees between 2001 and 2003. A preliminary study of provincial disability definitions conducted by a consultant on behalf of HRDC, and international definitions are also included as annexes. Finally, a table that summarizes the key initiatives reviewed is included in Annex D. By providing a database of information on key Government of Canada disability initiatives, this report is only a first step in our goal to provide a more coherent picture of our disability policies and programs. Improving our understanding of the interaction between the different concepts of disability through further research and consultation will assist the Government of Canada in its disability policy and program design. To deal with the broader issues will require further discussion and collaboration among and within governments to explore areas where consistent approaches could lead to improved programs and services for people with disabilities.

This report, one of the first of its kind, is a comprehensive overview of a vigorous and evolving global market. It offers objective information about D&I technology by establishing a common framework for it and identifying key vendors and their respective solutions. Our goal is to provide key stakeholders, such as vendors, organizational leaders, and consumers, an overview of this dynamic and important human resources (HR) technology marketplace. Our journey to understand the D&I technology market began nearly a year ago when we, RedThread Research and Mercer, decided to partner on this research. We had a vague idea it was a œhot market, but we did not understand the extent of its size and reach. This report, with its 105 vendors and 13 customer stories, is the result of a nine-month long effort.To provide a comprehensive overview of the D&I tech market, we split our study into two phases. The first phase resulted in a qualitative report, published in September 2018, that summarized the D&I technology market landscape. The second phase of the study, the current report, adds a quantitative component to our understanding of the D&I technology landscape. In addition, we interviewed customers and reviewed more vendors, and wove their insights throughout the report. Finally, we included customer success stories and screenshots from the vendors those customers used, to bring the numbers to life

Understanding the impact of immigrants on international trade is particularly important for Canada, as it is a small open economy with a relatively large immigrant population. This paper empirically investigates the effect of immigrant business ownership on international trade in Canada using a newly developed firm-level database with detailed business ownership and trade information. The new data make it possible to better distinguish between the effect immigrants have on reducing information costs and on product demand, and to assess the impact of immigrant business ownership on the extensive and intensive margins of international trade. The results show that although the effect of immigrant business ownership on international trade with all partner regions is either insignificant or small on average, immigrant-owned firms have a positive and significant effect on Canada's trade with the regions of origin of immigrant owners. Compared with Canadian-owned firms, immigrant-owned firms in the manufacturing sector have, on average, a higher probability of importing from (by 6.7 percentage points) and exporting to (by 2.1 percentage points) the immigrant owners' regions of origin, ceteris paribus. Also, conditional on being importers or exporters, immigrant-owned firms have stronger trade connections with the regions of origin of immigrant owners--as measured by a larger number of products and average value per product imported or exported--than their Canadian-owned counterparts. The impact of immigrant business ownership is even larger in the wholesale trade sector, highlighting the role of immigrants as trade intermediaries. Immigrant owners admitted through the business, skilled labour or provincial nominee classes, and owners with a higher level of education upon arrival, are more likely to have a greater impact on international trade than other immigrant owners.

The report highlights declarations form the 2018 G20 meeting focused on the following pillars: the future of work, infrastructure for development, a sustainable food future and a gender mainstreaming strategy across the G20 agenda

26 January 2016 View CITI GPS Report Technology at Work v2.0: The Future Is Not What It Used to Be, produced by the Oxford Martin School and Citi, provides in-depth analysis of the vulnerabilities of countries and cities to job automation, explores what automation will mean for traditional models of economic growth, and considers how governments can prepare for the potentially disruptive impacts of job automation on society. It builds on 2013 research by Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne which found that 47 per cent of US jobs were at risk of automation over the next two decades, and on the first Technology at Work Citi GPS report, published in 2015. As well as collaborating on the Citi GPS series of reports, the School has partnered with Citi to create a new programme of research, the Oxford Martin Programme on Technology and Employment, to investigate the implications of a rapidly changing technological landscape for economies and societies.

This Economic Insights article documents age‘adjusted mean earnings by detailed field of study among 25‘ to 54‘year‘old university and college graduates who worked full year, full time in 2010. The data are drawn from the 2011 National Household Survey. The results suggest that management sciences and quantitative methods graduates were the top earners among male and female bachelor's degree holders in 2010. The study also finds that earnings vary considerably among graduates from specific fields of study that are typically grouped together (e.g. economics graduates earn more than graduates from other social science programs, such as sociology and psychology).